<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apartments, not condos for 3rd and Main</title>
	<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/</link>
	<description>A blog about Downtown Jacksonville, Springfield, LaVilla, Brooklyn, the Southbank and San Marco.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rg harding</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-118637</link>
		<dc:creator>rg harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-118637</guid>
		<description>Condos would have brought in a more stable, settled type of people. Ones that would stay there and have real concerns about the upkeep of the condos / area(Springfield) because they would be actual residents of Springfield with a financial interest. They are always more desirable in an up and coming area - it helps to seed the area - especially, in a transitional environment. With apartments you get transitional people and depreciative properties - not really what a neighborhood renovating needs. Sad to hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Condos would have brought in a more stable, settled type of people. Ones that would stay there and have real concerns about the upkeep of the condos / area(Springfield) because they would be actual residents of Springfield with a financial interest. They are always more desirable in an up and coming area - it helps to seed the area - especially, in a transitional environment. With apartments you get transitional people and depreciative properties - not really what a neighborhood renovating needs. Sad to hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downtownparks</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-55038</link>
		<dc:creator>Downtownparks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-55038</guid>
		<description>They do have an agreement with Shands, but I dont know the details of the agreement (ie, can they rent out to others if units are open)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do have an agreement with Shands, but I dont know the details of the agreement (ie, can they rent out to others if units are open)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anitaly</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-55036</link>
		<dc:creator>anitaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-55036</guid>
		<description>Someone may want to confirm this....I have heard that the apartments at third and Main will be rented by Shands or Shand patience that are being treated (and their families), and need a place to stay....not sure if there will be a certain number of units for Shands and the rest just rentals or???....but the first floor is supposed to be retail and that within itself is pleasant thought.   

Did I spell everything right?!?!?!...LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone may want to confirm this&#8230;.I have heard that the apartments at third and Main will be rented by Shands or Shand patience that are being treated (and their families), and need a place to stay&#8230;.not sure if there will be a certain number of units for Shands and the rest just rentals or???&#8230;.but the first floor is supposed to be retail and that within itself is pleasant thought.   </p>
<p>Did I spell everything right?!?!?!&#8230;LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uturn</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>Uturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>But isn't "barbed wire" a single article?  I don't know - I hated English.  And why care?  We'll all be speaking Spanish before long anyway :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t &#8220;barbed wire&#8221; a single article?  I don&#8217;t know - I hated English.  And why care?  We&#8217;ll all be speaking Spanish before long anyway :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>So wouldn't it be the words are barbed wire, not the word is barbed wire? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wouldn&#8217;t it be the words are barbed wire, not the word is barbed wire? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uturn</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Uturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>I thought Barbwire was Pamela Anderson?  Maybe that's what Downtownparks is talking about :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Barbwire was Pamela Anderson?  Maybe that&#8217;s what Downtownparks is talking about :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid S.</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>The word is barbed wire not Barbwire or Bobwire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word is barbed wire not Barbwire or Bobwire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downtownparks</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>Downtownparks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>Hey Hionedes, How about ANYTHING!

I like Macks comment from the Business meeting it was something to the effect of "would you mind taking down the Barbwire on Main St to make it look a little less like a prison camp"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Hionedes, How about ANYTHING!</p>
<p>I like Macks comment from the Business meeting it was something to the effect of &#8220;would you mind taking down the Barbwire on Main St to make it look a little less like a prison camp&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>I actually prefer this.  I rent a house right around the corner, and I'd much rather have young people renting than 30 something yuppies buying these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually prefer this.  I rent a house right around the corner, and I&#8217;d much rather have young people renting than 30 something yuppies buying these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skimbro</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>skimbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.urbanjacksonville.info/2006/10/17/apartments-not-condos-for-3rd-and-main/#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>As long as the apartment building is well done, as this one apparently will be, I think it's good for the 'hood. Look at the precedent in Riverside. The apartments across the street from the new Publix were one of the first new things to be built over there. Once that got established and helped anchor the area, retail and restaurants in 5 Points and the Publix complex ticked up significantly. And now a luxury condo building is being built across the street. (Hey Hionedes, are you noticing the parallel here? How about that lot of yours across the street from Cesery's?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the apartment building is well done, as this one apparently will be, I think it&#8217;s good for the &#8216;hood. Look at the precedent in Riverside. The apartments across the street from the new Publix were one of the first new things to be built over there. Once that got established and helped anchor the area, retail and restaurants in 5 Points and the Publix complex ticked up significantly. And now a luxury condo building is being built across the street. (Hey Hionedes, are you noticing the parallel here? How about that lot of yours across the street from Cesery&#8217;s?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
